Gavin Newsom’s Podcast Pivot: A Sign of a Democratic Shift to the Right?

California Governor Gavin Newsom has long been a poster child for progressive politics—a champion of LGBTQ+ rights, a vocal advocate for marginalized communities, and a fixture of the Democratic Party’s left wing. But his recent podcast, This is Gavin Newsom, launched in March 2025, has raised eyebrows and sparked debate. In just two weeks, Newsom has distanced himself from some of the very causes he once fought for, like the use of “Latinx” and unrestricted transgender participation in women’s sports. This isn’t just a personal rebrand—it might signal a broader reckoning within the Democratic Party, one that could nudge it rightward after years of clinging to far-left positions that, it turns out, aren’t resonating with the American public.

The Podcast That Shook the Left

Newsom’s podcast debut wasn’t subtle. He sat down with Charlie Kirk, a conservative firebrand from Turning Point USA, and didn’t just play nice—he agreed with him on key cultural flashpoints. Take “Latinx,” the gender-neutral term embraced by progressive elites to describe Latino communities. Newsom claimed, “Not one person ever in my office has ever used the word Latinx,” dismissing it as an “out-of-touch fixation.” Yet, as CNN’s KFile team pointed out, Newsom himself used it repeatedly in 2020 press briefings and X posts, like when he said, “I hope we can really paint a picture… of how impactful this has been on the Latinx community.” The reversal is stark—and telling.

Then there’s transgender athletes in women’s sports. Newsom, who signed laws expanding transgender rights, including a 2020 bill acknowledging prisoners’ need for gender transition care, now calls it “deeply unfair” for trans women to compete against cisgender women. He told Kirk, “The issue of fairness is completely legit… we’ve got to own that.” This from a man who, as lieutenant governor, praised the 2013 School Success and Opportunity Act that allowed trans athletes to compete based on gender identity. It’s a 180-degree turn that’s left his progressive base reeling.

And it didn’t stop there. Newsom took a swipe at taxpayer-funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and detained immigrants, calling it a “90/10” issue—implying 90% of Americans oppose it. He was referencing Kamala Harris’ 2019 ACLU questionnaire support for such policies, which later became fodder for Trump’s devastating “Kamala is for they/them, Trump is for you” ad. Newsom’s critique? It hurt Democrats, and they didn’t even fight back.

Why the Shift? The 2024 Wake-Up Call

The timing isn’t random. The Democratic Party is still licking its wounds from the 2024 election, where Republicans swept the White House and Congress, leaving Democrats with record-low favorability. Progressives might argue it was messaging or turnout, but Newsom seems to see a deeper problem: some of their flagship cultural positions are electoral losers. Polls back this up. A September 2024 Pew Research survey found 75% of Latinos who’ve heard “Latinx” think it shouldn’t be used. On trans athletes, a 2025 New York Times/Ipsos poll showed nearly 70% of Democrats—yes, Democrats—oppose trans women in women’s sports. These aren’t fringe opinions; they’re mainstream.

Newsom’s not alone in sensing the tide. After the election, Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) said Democrats spent too much time avoiding offense instead of being “brutally honest.” He told The New York Times, “I don’t want [my daughters] getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I’m supposed to be afraid to say that.” Newsom’s podcast echoes this frustration, suggesting a party elite increasingly aware that their far-left stances—however morally grounded—don’t sell in Peoria.

A Rightward Drift in the Making?

So, is this the start of a Democratic shift to the right? It’s not hard to imagine. Newsom’s moves feel calculated—he’s a potential 2028 presidential contender, and he’s not going to win a national primary, let alone a general election, by doubling down on policies that alienate swing voters. His podcast, with its friendly chats with conservatives like Kirk and Steve Bannon, seems designed to test a new lane: center-left, pragmatic, willing to ditch the dogma. It’s the Joe Biden playbook, minus the decades of baggage.

This could ripple through the party. If a high-profile figure like Newsom—governing the nation’s bluest state—can pivot, others might follow. Imagine a 2028 primary where candidates compete not on who’s more progressive, but on who can best reclaim the middle. Issues like “Latinx” could fade from the lexicon; trans sports policies might get a hard rethink. Even economic priorities could shift—Newsom’s Bannon episode focused on taxes and trade, hinting at a populist streak that could appeal beyond coastal elites.

The Pushback and the Risk

Of course, the left won’t go quietly. California’s LGBT caucus called Newsom’s trans athlete remarks “profoundly sickening.” State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) said it’s “devastating and depressing” from a supposed ally. Trans rights advocates argue Democrats shouldn’t retreat when Republicans are escalating attacks—like Trump’s February 2025 executive order banning trans athletes from women’s sports. They fear a rightward shift abandons vulnerable communities for political expediency.

Newsom’s threading a needle here. He’s trying to keep some progressive cred—nodding to trans suicide rates and calling for “humility and grace”—while jettisoning the unpopular bits. It’s a gamble. If he alienates the base too much, he risks a primary revolt. But if he’s right about the electorate, he might drag the party into winnable territory.

The Bigger Picture

Newsom’s podcast isn’t just a personal pivot—it’s a microcosm of a party at a crossroads. The Democrats’ far-left experiment, born in the Obama years and supercharged under Trump’s first term, might have hit its limit. The 2024 loss exposed a disconnect: what plays in San Francisco doesn’t fly in Scranton. A rightward shift wouldn’t mean abandoning core values—think healthcare or climate—but recalibrating cultural stances to match public sentiment.

As of March 22, 2025, with the podcast still fresh, it’s too early to call this a trend. But Newsom’s moves suggest he’s betting on it. If he’s right, the Democratic Party of 2028 might look less like AOC and more like a rebooted Bill Clinton—pragmatic, centrist, and ready to win again. The question is whether the party’s soul can survive the journey.

Sources: